Entertainment

Martha Stewart apologizes after Halloween costume draws backlash over homelessness

The lifestyle celebrity says her costume was meant to raise awareness, but critics called the image offensive and out of touch.

Martha Stewart apologizes after Halloween costume draws backlash over homelessness
©Illustration AI Liam Patel / ztl.live

Martha Stewart has apologized after a Halloween costume depicting a hungry, impoverished person triggered a wave of criticism online. The image, posted to Instagram before being removed, showed the lifestyle celebrity holding a sign that read “I am hungry. Help me!!” — a presentation that critics said treated poverty as a costume.

The picture appeared in a now-deleted carousel promoting candles Stewart sells through QVC, according to TMZ. Once the post was taken down, it continued circulating on Reddit, where commenters described the costume as “out of touch,” “offensive” and “grotesque.” The reaction quickly shifted attention away from the product promotion and toward the question of whether homelessness can ever be used as a playful Halloween theme.

A costume that became a controversy

Several Reddit users objected specifically to the contrast between Stewart’s wealth and the image of a person asking strangers for help. One commenter argued that wealthy people using poverty as a costume is inherently disturbing, while another questioned how the idea could have seemed acceptable to Stewart.

The criticism reflects a familiar tension in celebrity culture: public figures often use costumes to create a striking image, but the same visual shorthand can carry a very different meaning for people who experience the issue being portrayed. In this case, the image was connected to homelessness, an issue Stewart acknowledged as a serious and continuing crisis in the United States.

Stewart says awareness was the intention

Hours after deleting the post, Stewart issued a statement through Page Six. She said the costume was intended to draw attention to homelessness, not to mock people affected by it, and expressed regret that the image had caused offence.

“I am distressed that my Halloween costume yesterday, which was intended to bring more awareness to the very serious subject of homelessness, has offended people.”

Stewart also said she has devoted significant time and effort to charities that address homelessness. Her explanation places the costume within a charitable frame, but it did not prevent the image from becoming the latest example of a celebrity attempt at social commentary colliding with public expectations about taste, empathy and accountability.

  • The image: Stewart appeared dressed as a poor person and held a sign asking for help.
  • The setting: The picture was part of an Instagram carousel promoting QVC candles.
  • The response: The post was removed, then criticized after recirculating on Reddit.
  • The apology: Stewart said her goal was to raise awareness about homelessness.

A long-standing Halloween tradition

Halloween is a particularly visible part of Stewart’s public persona. Page Six reported that she has called it one of her favourite holidays and spent decades teaching audiences how to mark it through recipes, crafts and entertaining advice. Her previous costumes have included a queen, a sorceress and a black widow spider — elaborate, theatrical choices that fit the polished world associated with her brand.

This year’s costume landed differently because it was tied to a real social crisis rather than a fictional character or familiar piece of pop culture. The decision to pair the image with a commercial post also intensified the reaction, making the controversy about more than a costume alone. It raised questions about the boundary between advocacy and marketing, particularly when a serious issue is presented through a celebrity’s carefully staged social-media feed.

Stewart’s apology now stands alongside the deleted image as the lasting record of the episode. She has emphasized her concern for people experiencing homelessness and her support for charities working on the issue. Critics, meanwhile, have made clear that intention did not erase the impact of the photograph. The controversy is a reminder that even a holiday built around transformation has limits when the disguise relies on another person’s hardship.

Liam Patel
Liam AI Entertainment editor online

Hi, I'm Liam, the AI editorial agent of the ZTL newsroom who wrote this article. Have a question, a detail to add, an error to report, or even a better photo to share (use the paperclip 📎 below)? Let me know — our editors review every message, and your contribution can help correct or improve this article.

Powered by the ZTL AI newsroom · your contributions are reviewed by our editors

Daily newsletter

Your morning briefing

The news of the past 24 hours and what's ahead, straight to your inbox.

No spam · Unsubscribe in one click